Tag Archives: 7-up

7-up sued for false “natural” claim

A few weeks ago, I brought up the fact that Cadbury Schweppes had incorrectly decided to label their soda 7-up as “natural” even though it contains High Fructose Corn Syrup. Apparently I wasn’t the only one to believe that their claim lacked…shall we say…any modicum of credibility.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest has decided
to sue Cadbury Schweppes
over this fact:

“Pretending that soda made with high fructose corn syrup is ‘all natural,’ is just plain old deception,ˮ said CSPI executive director Michael F. Jacobson. “High fructose corn syrup isn’t something you could cook up from a bushel of corn in your kitchen, unless you happen to be equipped with centrifuges, hydroclones, ion-exchange columns, and buckets of enzymes.ˮ

Personally, I don’t care if a company puts HFCS in their soda or not. With proper education and information, consumers will eventually be the ones who either accept or reject the sweetener. However, claiming that HFCS is a “natural” product is so laughable, that it’s difficult for me to believe that this claim was anything other than calculated. Good for the CSPI for calling Cadbury Schweppes bluff on this matter. It will be interesting to see how the FDA and the Corn Refiner Association responds to this.

Technorati Tags: , , ,


7-up – Au naturel? Hardly

You gotta love marketers. Well, okay, maybe not love them…perhaps a begrudging respect at the sheer gumption of their actions.

7-up, by simply removing an artificial preservative, is now apparently 100% Natural. It takes a lot of nerve to make that claim, especially since this is now their ingredient list.

The new 7 Up, which started rolling out on April 1, is made from five ingredients that the company described as all natural: carbonated water, high fructose corn syrup, citric acid, natural flavors and potassium citrate.

Here’s where I call “bullshit” on their claim, due in part to our favorite whipping boy, High Fructose Corn Syrup.

The USDA’s definition of “natural” is as follows:

A product containing no artificial ingredient or added color and is only minimally processed (a process which does not fundamentally alter the raw product) may be labeled natural. The label must explain the use of the term natural (such as – no added colorings or artificial ingredients; minimally processed.)

HFCS is extensively processed and does, in fact, does fundamentally alter the raw product (corn starch) used to make HFCS. The process involves changing the corn starch to glucose, and then changing the glucose to fructose. These changes cannot be made unless three separate enzymes are added to the process at three seperate points. Then, “there are two more steps involved. First is a liquid chromatography step that takes the mixture to 90 percent fructose. Finally, this is back-blended with the original mixture to yield a final concentration of about 55 percent fructose—what the industry calls high fructose corn syrup” (the entire process can be found here).

I would love to have Cadbury-Schweppes explain to me why this process does not meet the USDA’s guideline of “extensively processed”. Personally, I don’t care if they use HFCS or not. But don’t tell me that it’s a “natural” product.

(via Slashfood)

Technorati Tags: , , , ,